![]() ![]() using git, you can collaborate on files inside a Subversion repository, similar things are bound to exist for other tools). Most regular version control system have these features and can cooperate with each other to some extent (e.g. If your versioning information is stored within the file, you depend upon the vendor to provide the right (exporting) features should you want to switch to another tool or extract a `checkout’ of some latest version. Putting everything inside the files is risky as that puts too much faith into a single piece of software. With regard to versioning info internal in the files or external, I too find it more convenient to have the version control outside of my files. I haven’t set this up for my version control system, but if you happen to use git, you can find a short guide on how to do so for tex files. Apparently, some tools exist to cope with this: e.g. I’ve run into the same problem as Vinh and John: when diffing line-by-line you get huge diffs even when only a single word has changed. When I write LaTeX, I tend to manually end all lines (prose and math) around the 80th column, to keep everything a bit manageable and two line ends after most paragraphs. I much prefer using a version control system to track changes to my files, but that approach won’t fly with people who don’t share a common version control system or don’t use version control at all. Go to Tools -> Options, and under 'File Windows' you'll. In the absence of a BOM, your System Default will be used. Word provides a sort of object oriented versioning system, bundling versioning functionality with the data.Īs with functional versus object oriented programming, there’s no “right” way to solve this problem, only approaches that work better in different contexts. By default it will look for a Byte Order Mark (BOM) at the beginning of the file to determine the encoding used for that file. The versioning functionality is unbundled from the file content, in part because the content (typically source code files) could be used by many different applications. Version control systems have a functional view of files. These two approaches are analogous to functional programming versus object oriented programming. My view is typical of software developers. He assumed the version information would be bundled with the document. I assumed version information would be external to the document. In that setting, a plain text file has no version history, but a Word document may. He’s accustomed to seeing documents in isolation, such as a file attachment in an email. My colleague was thinking about using the change tracking features of Microsoft Word. But with something like a Word document, the system will give an unhelpful message like “binary files differ.” With a text file, the version control system can tell you exactly how two versions differ. I was thinking about checking files in and out of a version control system. How could we interpret the same facts so differently? He said that LaTeX was impossible to version because its files are just plain text. ![]() ![]() The other day I said to a colleague that an advantage to LaTeX over Microsoft Word is that it’s easy to version LaTeX files because they’re just plain text. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |